home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: comma.rhein.de!serpens!not-for-mail
- From: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de (Michael van Elst)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: PPC compilers
- Date: 10 Jan 1996 23:40:46 +0100
- Organization: dis-
- Message-ID: <4d1f9e$ctb@serpens.rhein.de>
- References: <john.hendrikx.40ka@grafix.xs4all.nl> <4b77tq$htp@serpens.rhein.de> <5BoUx*MZe@yaps.rhein.de> <4cpi23$ong@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <4cq342$j2l@serpens.rhein.de> <4csvb6$oa6@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <4cu1pq$1om@serpens.rhein.de> <DKyzGr.1G0@hermes.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: serpens.rhein.de
-
- isthesin@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de (Stephan Thesing) writes:
-
- >|> The precondition is already wrong and so is the claim.
-
- >Not really.
- >'if p then c' is only false, if p==true and c==false, but
- >trivially true, if p==false, as anybody see by looking
- >at the truth table of the implication relation ;-)
-
- I would ask you to improve your logic.
-
- and so != and therefore.
-
-
- --
- Michael van Elst
-
- Internet: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de
- "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
-